EPOKA UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE
COURSE SYLLABUS
2021-2022 ACADEMIC YEAR
COURSE INFORMATIONCourse Title: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN I |
| Code | Course Type | Regular Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credits | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARCH 201 | B | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| Academic staff member responsible for the design of the course syllabus (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) | NA |
| Main Course Lecturer (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) and Office Hours: | M.Sc. Kreshnik Merxhani kmerxhani@epoka.edu.al , Tuesday 08:45-10:30 |
| Second Course Lecturer(s) (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) and Office Hours: | NA |
| Teaching Assistant(s) and Office Hours: | NA |
| Language: | English |
| Compulsory/Elective: | Compulsory |
| Study program: (the study for which this course is offered) | Integrated second cycle study program in Architecture (5 years) |
| Classroom and Meeting Time: | Studio II; Monday and Thursday, at 09:30-13:15. |
| Code of Ethics: |
Code of Ethics of EPOKA University Regulation of EPOKA University "On Student Discipline" |
| Attendance Requirement: | |
| Course Description: | Arch201 Architectural Design studio is aiming to make the bridging between the conceptual discourse on design during the first year and the architecture designed for real life situations. Yet, a considerable importance is given to the initial stage of architectural design process; the Concept development phase. The CONCEPT idea which is expected to be generated via a thorough analysis of the CONTEXT in which the architectural product will be settled and the CONTENT for which it will serve for. |
| Course Objectives: | The main objective of Arch 201 Architectural Design Studio is to introduce students with the real life factors, as direct parameters affecting the architectural design decisions. It is aimed that students built enough consciousness about the Context forces and the Content requirements as crucial integral parts of the architectural design process. The context selected for this semester is the city of Ulqin in Montenegro. Students are expected to develop a House+ project which accommodates dwelling aside working, according to the project brief delivered to the students during the first meeting of the class. |
|
BASIC CONCEPTS OF THE COURSE
|
| 1 | Content + Context = Concept |
|
COURSE OUTLINE
|
| Week | Topics |
| 1 | Week 1 : Introduction / Workshop 02.11 : Introduction to Arch201 : Warm-up / Interplay of volumes in a sloped terrain |
| 2 | Week 2 : Site Visit / Context- Content- CONCEPT 09.11 : Site Visit : Presentation of Draft work: Analysis from Site Trip/ Site Model production |
| 3 | Week 3 : Presentations of Case- studies 16.11 : Presentation: Analysis from Site Trip/ Site Model production : Presentation: Case studies & Superimposition exercise |
| 4 | Week 4 : Concept Development / Panel Discussion [all groups] 23.11 : Lecture 1 “Context + Content => CONCEPT” : Panel Discussion on Sketch Ideas - First Design proposals : Panel Discussion on Sketch Ideas - First Design proposals |
| 5 | Week 5 : Concept development / Individual Discussion 30.11 : National Holiday- Flag and Independence Day : Lecture 2 “Basics of Dwelling” : Table Discussion on Sketch Ideas - First Design proposals |
| 6 | Week 6 : Concept development / 1st Preliminary Jury 7.12 : Lecture 3 “Dwelling Spatial Design Standards” : Table Discussion on Sketch Ideas - First Design proposals |
| 7 | Week 7 : Mid-Term Week / Consulting up to Request 14.12 : Table Discussion on Project Development - Design proposals [up to request] : Table Discussion on Project Development - Design proposals [up to request] |
| 8 | Week 8 : 1 Pre-jury 21.12 : 1st Preliminary Jury- Day 1 : 1st Preliminary Jury- Day 2 |
| 9 | Week 9 : Table Discussion on Project Development [up to 1/200] : Lecture 4 “Dwelling & Landscape” : Table Discussion on Project Development - Design proposals |
| 10 | Week 10 : Architectural Design– Project Development : Table Discussion on Project Development - Design proposals : Table Discussion on Project Development - Design proposals |
| 11 | Week 11 : 2nd Preliminary Jury [up to 1/200] : 2nd Preliminary Jury- Day 1 : 2nd Preliminary Jury- Day 2 |
| 12 | Week 12 : Architectural Design– Project Development : Panel Discussion on Project Development - Design proposals : Table Discussion on Project Development |
| 13 | Week 13 : Architectural Design– Project Development : Table Discussion on Project Development : Table Discussion on Project Development |
| 14 | Week 14 : 3rd Preliminary Jury / Final Review [up to 1/100] : 3rd Preliminary Jury- Day 1 : 3rd Preliminary Jury- Day 2 |
| Prerequisite(s): | Arch101 and Arch102 |
| Textbook(s): | Zumthor, P. (1998). Thinking Architecture. Lars Müller. Zumthor, P. (2006). Atmospheres: Architectural Environments, Surrounding Objects. Birkhäuser Architecture. Tschumi, B. (1996). Sequences. In B. Tschumi, Architecture and Disjunction (pp. 153-172). MIT Press. Tschumi, B. (1996). Spaces and Events. In B. Tschumi, Architecture and Disjunction (pp. 140-155). MIT Press. |
| Additional Literature: | |
| Laboratory Work: | No |
| Computer Usage: | No |
| Others: | No |
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
|
| 1 | Advancement of sketching techniques as an important tool for architectural concept development |
| 2 | Using the model making practice more as a design medium than just a presentation method |
| 3 | Ability to develop one of the most basic architectural typologies like house, beyond its basic function of dwelling |
| 4 | Developing the skill of following an architectural design process workflow, starting with concept development till the detailing of architectural elements of the proposal. |
| 5 | Developing the ability to correctly and trustfully communicate the architectural ideas during the process as well as presenting in front of a professional jury panel. |
| 6 | learning how to approach to an architectural problem located in a predominantly historical rural context |
|
COURSE CONTRIBUTION TO... PROGRAM COMPETENCIES
(Blank : no contribution, 1: least contribution ... 5: highest contribution) |
| No | Program Competencies | Cont. |
| Integrated second cycle study program in Architecture (5 years) Program | ||
|
COURSE EVALUATION METHOD
|
| Method | Quantity | Percentage |
| Presentation |
3
|
15
|
| Project |
1
|
45
|
| Other |
1
|
10
|
| Total Percent: | 100% |
|
ECTS (ALLOCATED BASED ON STUDENT WORKLOAD)
|
| Activities | Quantity | Duration(Hours) | Total Workload(Hours) |
| Course Duration (Including the exam week: 16x Total course hours) | 16 | 8 | 128 |
| Hours for off-the-classroom study (Pre-study, practice) | 16 | 4 | 64 |
| Mid-terms | 0 | ||
| Assignments | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| Final examination | 1 | 18 | 18 |
| Other | 0 | ||
|
Total Work Load:
|
250 | ||
|
Total Work Load/25(h):
|
10 | ||
|
ECTS Credit of the Course:
|
10 | ||
|
CONCLUDING REMARKS BY THE COURSE LECTURER
|
|
Any case of coping from others works will be reported as plagiarism. |