EPOKA UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE
COURSE SYLLABUS
COURSE INFORMATIONCourse Title: PARADIGMS IN ARCHITECTURE |
| Code | Course Type | Regular Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credits | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARCH 571 | D | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Academic staff member responsible for the design of the course syllabus (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) | NA |
| Lecturer (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) and Office Hours: | Desantila Hysa |
| Second Lecturer(s) (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) and Office Hours: | NA |
| Teaching Assistant(s) and Office Hours: | NA |
| Language: | English |
| Compulsory/Elective: | Elective |
| Classroom and Meeting Time: | |
| Course Description: | - |
| Course Objectives: | What does the scope, structure and content of practice reveal about the state of design and ambitions of design today? This course will be structured around a series of case studies of modes of practice that range from the poetic and experimental, to the normative, to interdisciplinary hybrids and socially engaged collectives. Students will examine the philosophical premises of different conceptions of practice through the course readings. And they will compare different approaches to production, collaboration, and authorship, through observations and interviews. Each student will be paired with a particular studio, firm or collaborative in order to produce their final paper: a profile and contextual analysis of a particular practice and its implications for the professions and the future. |
|
COURSE OUTLINE
|
| Week | Topics |
| 1 | Introduction |
| 2 | Shifting Paradigms |
| 3 | Social/Participatory/Collaborative Design |
| 4 | Case Study: William Morris, architect, urban designer |
| 5 | Critical Design |
| 6 | Case Study: George Nelson, architect, designer, writer |
| 7 | Design and Ethics |
| 8 | Case Study: Christopher Robbins, artist |
| 9 | Midterm Week |
| 10 | Case Study: Dan Friedman, communication designer |
| 11 | DIY/DIWO/Agency |
| 12 | Case Study: Peter Lloyd Jones, biologist/hybrid designer |
| 13 | Perspectives on the Relevance of Aesthetics |
| 14 | Student Presentations |
| Prerequisite(s): | |
| Textbook: | Ericson, Magnus and Ramia Mazé, eds. Design Act: Socially and politically engaged design today – critical roles and emerging tactics. Sternberg Press, 2011. Kvale, Steinar and Brinkman, Svend. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. (2nd Edition) Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage Publications, Inc, 2009. Leach, Neil. Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge, 1997. Friedman, Dan; Deitch, Jeffrey; Holt, Steven; Mendini, Alessandro. Dan Friedman: Radical Modernism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994. Meroni, Anna, ed. Creative communities: People inventing sustainable ways of living. Milano: Edizioni POLI.design, 1st Edition, January 2007. Manzini, Ezio and Tassinari, Virginia, “Sustainable qualities: powerful drivers of social change; How social innovation is changing the world (and how design can help),” 10.11.2012. Smith, Cynthia. Design with the Other 90%: Cities. New York: Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum, Smithsonian Institution, 2011. |
| Other References: | |
| Laboratory Work: | |
| Computer Usage: | |
| Others: | No |
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
|
| 1 | Proficiency in primary research and interviewing. |
| 2 | Ability to contextualize design within related modes of thought, i.e. philosophy, sociology, anthropology, history, and aesthetics. |
| 3 | Ability to produce a concept map of a design practice. |
| 4 | Ability to write a critically constructive profile of a living designer. |
|
COURSE CONTRIBUTION TO... PROGRAM COMPETENCIES
(Blank : no contribution, 1: least contribution ... 5: highest contribution) |
| No | Program Competencies | Cont. |
| Integrated second cycle study program in Architecture (5 years) Program | ||
|
COURSE EVALUATION METHOD
|
| Method | Quantity | Percentage |
| Homework |
4
|
10
|
| Presentation |
1
|
20
|
| Term Paper |
1
|
30
|
| Attendance |
10
|
|
| Total Percent: | 100% |
|
ECTS (ALLOCATED BASED ON STUDENT WORKLOAD)
|
| Activities | Quantity | Duration(Hours) | Total Workload(Hours) |
| Course Duration (Including the exam week: 16x Total course hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Hours for off-the-classroom study (Pre-study, practice) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Mid-terms | 0 | ||
| Assignments | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| Final examination | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Other | 0 | ||
|
Total Work Load:
|
150 | ||
|
Total Work Load/25(h):
|
6 | ||
|
ECTS Credit of the Course:
|
6 | ||