EPOKA UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE
COURSE SYLLABUS
COURSE INFORMATIONCourse Title: DESIGN METHODS |
| Code | Course Type | Regular Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credits | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARCH 421 | B | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Academic staff member responsible for the design of the course syllabus (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) | NA |
| Lecturer (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) and Office Hours: | Odeta Manahasa , Wednesday(s), 11:30-13:30 |
| Second Lecturer(s) (name, surname, academic title/scientific degree, email address and signature) and Office Hours: | Desantila Hysa |
| Teaching Assistant(s) and Office Hours: | NA |
| Language: | English |
| Compulsory/Elective: | Compulsory |
| Classroom and Meeting Time: | Tuesdays, 09:45 @ A-126 (online) |
| Course Description: | This course explores some ideas that can lead to a stronger intellectual base for a designer's actions. The course content is focused on the different perspectives on Design activity. An overview of the shifts in design thinking theory and practice. The main scope of the course is to overview the question of “what design thinking is” rather than “how to design”. This significant question will constitute a starting point for the discussions. |
| Course Objectives: | The main goal is to raise students' awareness of the diversity of ideas, methods and new practices characterizing the design discipline, in relation to other disciplines. Students will develop skills of research and interpretation by analyzing and synthesizing the course content and conveying their ideas using verbal, visual and written formats. |
|
COURSE OUTLINE
|
| Week | Topics |
| 1 | Syllabus + Introduction |
| 2 | Design, Disruption, Disruptors |
| 3 | Design Research |
| 4 | Design Thinking |
| 5 | National Holiday-Liberation Day |
| 6 | National Holiday-National Youth Day |
| 7 | Design Thinking (continued) |
| 8 | Design Cognition |
| 9 | Wicked Problems in Design Thinking |
| 10 | Managing as Designing |
| 11 | Design Attitude |
| 12 | The Nature of Design |
| 13 | Design for Innovation |
| 14 | Final Project Review |
| Prerequisite(s): | No-prerequisite |
| Textbook: | Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research. Design Issues, 20(1), 16–29. | Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. | Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II. Design and Culture, 4(2), 129–148. | Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. | Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner : How professionals think in action. Basic Books. | Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143. | Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5. | Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. | Boland, R. J. (2008). Managing as designing. Stanford Business Books. | Bas Van Abel. (2011). Open design now : why design cannot remain exclusive. Bis Publishers. | Michlewski, K. (2008). Uncovering Design Attitude: Inside the Culture of Designers. Organization Studies, 29(3), 373–392. | Kolko, Jon (2017), "The Divisiveness of Design Thinking", in Interactions Magazine, XXV.3. | Kolko, Jon (2015), "Design Thinking Comes of Age" in Harvard Bussines Review. | Vogel, C. M. (2009). Notes on the Evolution of Design Thinking: A Work in Progress. Design Management Review, 20(2), 16–27. | Chick, A. (2012). Design for Social Innovation: Emerging Principles and Approaches. Iridescent, 2(1), 78–90. | Brown, T. (2009). CHANGE BY DESIGN : how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business. |
| Other References: | Screening | Design Disruptors: The Future is Designed, a documentary by Invision (2016) | Design and Thinking, A Muris Media production (2012) | Tim Brown @ TEDTalk: “Designers, think big!” | Martin, R.: 2009, “Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage” | Tim Brown @ TEDTalk: “Tales of Creativity and Play” | Jen, N. (2017, August). Natasha Jen: Design Thinking is Bu***t: https://vimeo.com/228126880. | |
| Laboratory Work: | |
| Computer Usage: | |
| Others: | No |
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
|
| 1 | Students will complete readings, light research work and build their skills and confidence addressing their colleagues. Assignments will be both individual and team-based. |
| 2 | Students will become fluent in matters of design practice and cultures |
| 3 | Students will improve their ability to craft compelling arguments to demonstrate their point of view |
| 4 | Through practice, students will be better able to communicate effectively within and across teams |
| 5 | Students will apply methods to consistently describe interactions for the purposes of ideation, exploration, and validation |
|
COURSE CONTRIBUTION TO... PROGRAM COMPETENCIES
(Blank : no contribution, 1: least contribution ... 5: highest contribution) |
| No | Program Competencies | Cont. |
| Integrated second cycle study program in Architecture (5 years) Program | ||
|
COURSE EVALUATION METHOD
|
| Method | Quantity | Percentage |
| Homework |
5
|
5
|
| Midterm Exam(s) |
1
|
35
|
| Project |
1
|
40
|
| Total Percent: | 100% |
|
ECTS (ALLOCATED BASED ON STUDENT WORKLOAD)
|
| Activities | Quantity | Duration(Hours) | Total Workload(Hours) |
| Course Duration (Including the exam week: 16x Total course hours) | 16 | 4 | 64 |
| Hours for off-the-classroom study (Pre-study, practice) | 14 | 4 | 56 |
| Mid-terms | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Assignments | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Final examination | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Other | 0 | ||
|
Total Work Load:
|
150 | ||
|
Total Work Load/25(h):
|
6 | ||
|
ECTS Credit of the Course:
|
6 | ||